Before I jump off the deep end ...
Sep. 27th, 2006 11:39 amI was wondering if I could pick the collective brains of my readers.
Yesterday I uploaded www.thebadplace.co.uk/cataclysm/gallery.htm to demonstrate the Lightbox I'd just added.
Now as you can doubtless see, some of the images aren't displaying ... and this is my problem.
I can see the images on the server and all have the appropriate file size. The same code works perfectly when I look at the page locally.
To be honest I'm at a loss as to why the page isn't working as intended, the only possible culprit I can think of is Madasafish - the site hosts. Before I ring them up (probably in Bangalore) and give them a flea in their ear ... can any of you think of another reason for this to happen?
Yesterday I uploaded www.thebadplace.co.uk/cataclysm/gallery.htm to demonstrate the Lightbox I'd just added.
Now as you can doubtless see, some of the images aren't displaying ... and this is my problem.
I can see the images on the server and all have the appropriate file size. The same code works perfectly when I look at the page locally.
To be honest I'm at a loss as to why the page isn't working as intended, the only possible culprit I can think of is Madasafish - the site hosts. Before I ring them up (probably in Bangalore) and give them a flea in their ear ... can any of you think of another reason for this to happen?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:01 am (UTC)http://www.thebadplace.co.uk/cataclysm/images/photos/june-06-001.jpg
you get a 404
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 12:29 pm (UTC)Other than that, all I know about the system is on the site, you can either look at the development site above or the official one at www.thetower.net/cataclysm (http://www.thetower.net/cataclysm). Had you been paying attention you would know that I begged them to let me redesign their site after seeing the horror that it used to be. Other than that, I'm just playing.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 11:35 am (UTC)On a user-interface point of view, can I point out how horrible that lightbox is though? As much as is possible, the controls that the user uses should remain static, and with that lightbox they don't. The point you have to click on to go to the next / previous photos moves dependant on the size of the photo. Incredibly annoying if the photos haven't been scaled to be the same width throughout.
You're not the first site I've seen using that interface, but it drives me batty.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 12:38 pm (UTC)Sorry that the Lightbox drives you nuts, I'm sorry to say that I rather like it though. Whilst I completely accept that you have a valid point from a usability point of view, I don't think it's a huge issue and I do really like the look of it. One thing I will do though, since you've pointed it out, is to group the portrait and landscape photos together so that you only need to move your pointing-device once. Is that a reasonable compromise?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 01:36 pm (UTC)bear in mind I'm not a user of the Cataclysm site, so any complaints I have should be treated with the proverbial ....
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 02:17 pm (UTC)