I stand corrected; I have just learned the misnomer quoted above was indeed corrected just before the event. There were other inconsistencies, but perhaps not as serious as the host being convincingly deceased!
As for the event, I heard very mixed reports, but then, no event pleases everyone. However, if what you say is right, revising the past however badly, can lead on to good events for the current players, which is perhaps the point. It grates on me, but then I am a writer more than a roleplayer. I think that [info]oldnick's suggestion above is an excellent one.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
This is my third revision
Date: 2005-11-29 10:39 am (UTC)I stand corrected; I have just learned the misnomer quoted above was indeed corrected just before the event. There were other inconsistencies, but perhaps not as serious as the host being convincingly deceased!
As for the event, I heard very mixed reports, but then, no event pleases everyone. However, if what you say is right, revising the past however badly, can lead on to good events for the current players, which is perhaps the point. It grates on me, but then I am a writer more than a roleplayer. I think that [info]oldnick's suggestion above is an excellent one.