This is my third revision

Date: 2005-11-29 10:39 am (UTC)
But I have good reason for it.

I stand corrected; I have just learned the misnomer quoted above was indeed corrected just before the event. There were other inconsistencies, but perhaps not as serious as the host being convincingly deceased!

As for the event, I heard very mixed reports, but then, no event pleases everyone. However, if what you say is right, revising the past however badly, can lead on to good events for the current players, which is perhaps the point. It grates on me, but then I am a writer more than a roleplayer. I think that [info]oldnick's suggestion above is an excellent one.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 02:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios